Constructing
an argument depends on whether it can flow logically within its structure.
Outlining a literature review sounds daunting, probably because it is.
Before
I do anything, I must define ADHD according to the DSM-V (Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the newest edition of the publication
by the American Psychiatric Association, which is nationally employed by
clinicians and physicians around the United States. The DSM defines ADHD as “a
persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity that
interferes with functioning or development.” To contextualize the prevalence
and importance of ADHD as an issue in the United States, I will present the
source by Faraone S., Sergeant J, Gilberg C, and Biederman, J from the World
Psychiatry Journal that states “Attention-deficit/hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) is a behavioral disorder that affects up to 1 in 20 children in
the USA."
While a source from Schlachter,
S. Peabody Journal of Education states, "This report describes the results
of that analysis, which indicated that, in 2003, approximately 4.4 million
children aged 4--17 years were reported to have a history of ADHD diagnosis; of
these, 2.5 million (56%) were reported to be taking medication for the disorder.”
I need to find a source with number of adults with ADHD in America. I instead
have comparisons of the two, but no real number for adults specifically.
After defining and
contextualizing, the argument can be delineated.
Subtopic 1: ADHD
First I have to provide
information of ADHD and what part of the brain it affects.
Premise 1: ADHD is associated
with certain increase of specific frequency of waves at certain parts of brain.
Support: According to
Biederman, ADHD originates in the frontal-subcortical pathways and often develop
with anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and learning disabilities. Through
analysis of fMRI’s Vaidya for the American Journal of Psychiatry found that
waves associated with ADHD were less prominent in the frontal-stratal-temporal-parietal
network of the brain. Certain parts of the brain of children with ADHD
exhibited lower task performance.
Another source from Clinical
Psychiatry Journal found through EEG imaging that increase in frontal lobe
theta activity (slow brain wave activity) when patients with ADHD were concentrating
v. decreasing activity normally.
Subtopic 2: ADHD in Adults
I need to show ADHD does exist
in adults as there is controversy surrounding this issue.
Premise 2: ADHD is often defined
as a “childhood disorder”, but does persist and can develop in adulthood.
Support: According to an
article by the British Medical Journal, "A more robust evidence base is
surely required before accepting a concept such as adult ADHD, which departs
from established views of the nature of behavioral problems, has a large
overlap with other diagnoses, and has only a tenuous association with childhood
disorder”. However, several research
studies prove that ADHD can be evidenced in adults, despite the DSM-IV stating
ADHD is “a developmentally sensitive” disorder.
According to Faraone S., a
study was conducted with families to see if relatives also had ADHD, and its
relation to adult ADHD with 49% correlation. Furthermore, in a study by BMC Psychiatry,
it was found through testing of 119 adults and 403 controls, that the most
prominent traits for adults with ADHD were different from children. Adults were
more likely to exhibit high novelty seeking (decision making based on impulse,
exploratory activity, and reward cues) and harm avoidance (worrying, fear,
fatigue), while children were more afflicted with inattention problems. Thus this shows that ADHD in adults exists and is different, therefore not a continuation or rather an evolution of the disorder into adulthood. Maybe if I can find a source that somehow manages to find a record of people who report ADHD in adulthood and did not have it in childhood. This would strengthen my argument, so any help in finding specific sources like that would be greatly appreciated.
Subtopic 3: Medication
Treatment for Children v. For Adults
Premise 3: Medication leads to
harmful side effects, abusive behavior, and injurious dependency.
Support: According to Setlik,
Randall, and Ho for the Journal of Pediatrics, sales data reflects that medication
abuse for adolescents is on the rise. According to this source, "calls
related to teenaged victims of prescription ADHD medication abuse rose 76%,
which is faster than calls for victim of substance abuse generally and teen
substance abuse." And in another source by UCLA
research Susan Smalley, it was found that, "as skyrocketing numbers of children are diagnosed with ADHD and
prescribed drugs, researchers are falling under increasing pressure to explain
this disorder."
I need more sources here
detailing how ADHD medication can lead to dependency and abuse. Also the
harmful side effects and toxicity issues it can cause. I have already found
some, but need to read through them.
Subtopic 4: Neurofeedback
Therapy/Why it is better
Premise 4: Neurofeedback
therapy may be the future for treating ADHD with minimal harmful effects
compared to ADHD medication.
Support: Neurofeedback therapy aims
to normalize abnormal EEG frequency by down-training certain wave frequencies. This
is done by attaching electrodes to the scalp. A client can then watch their EEG as
they play a game, watch a movie, or listen to tones. When they successful are
training their waves down or up, based on their protocol dictated by their
brain map, they will achieve points in the game, be able to see movie clearer,
or the tones will be less high pitched. Thus, they are consciously controlling
their brain waves, increasing concentration and relaxing their minds.
According to the ADNC
Neurofeedback Centre of BC, “in another investigation (Fuchs,
Birbaumer, Lutzenberger, Gruzelier, & Kaiser, 2003), children who had ADHD
were given either medication or neurofeedback. After about 40 neurofeedback
sessions the two groups were compared on a variety of traditional ADHD
measures. Findings indicated that the groups performed at a comparable level.” In
“A Symphony in the Brain”, it was stated that “as
frequency is enhanced during a neurotherapy session and the brain is activated,
more blood than usual streams to that area in the brain, the nutrients may be
strengthening or reorganizing existing connections."
I need to collect more sources comparing ADHD medication to neurofeedback therapy. I will look more into this.
Thus these sources detail the merits of neurofeedback therapy, specifically with children with ADHD.
I need to collect more sources comparing ADHD medication to neurofeedback therapy. I will look more into this.
Thus these sources detail the merits of neurofeedback therapy, specifically with children with ADHD.
Gap: This is where a gap exists
in the research, as no research has been done comparing adults and children
being treated with neurofeedback therapy.
This all leads to my research question: Is neurofeedback therapy a viable treatment option for adults and children? Or something along those lines.
Hopefully, that was not too
dense and made sense.
Word Count: 1091.. um.... oops, sorry. It is a lot of quotes??
Word Count: 1091.. um.... oops, sorry. It is a lot of quotes??
Hey Sunskruthi!! I’m really interested by your research topic; it’s seems really cool! I thought that you did a great job of beginning with certain foundational terms that you will need to define. Also, I think that your subtopics are structured in a way that will successfully lend to your research question.
ReplyDeleteI have some questions / suggestions to tighten your line of reasoning even more! In the second premise, you say that the behaviors that adults with ADHD prove that adults have ADHD. But how can you strengthen your evidence? For example, how do researchers know that those behavioral traits are indicators of ADHD and not other disorders? To find additional sources about adults reporting ADHD in adulthood only, I would maybe try to look at statistics published by the APA?
Your third subtopic is medication treatment for children v. adults, but your premise is about the effects of medication. I wasn’t able to see the differentiation between treatments for the age groups, because the main focus was on children/teens. Based off the rest of your outline, it may only be necessary to discuss the effects of treatments in general without comparing the different age groups.
I think that you are on the right track! My suggestions are basically to help you tighten the logic of your outline. Great job! (221)
I agree with what Divya is saying here -- are the behaviors exhibited exclusive to ADHD, or can they be attributed to other causes? If so, the behaviors themselves might not be sufficient in proving ADHD.
DeleteI also agree that you'll need to more clearly show not only that adults have ADHD, but why, in terms of treatment, we need to differentiate between adults and children.
Your outline does seem pretty solid! I think you've covered most of your bases in terms of knowing what you need to look at in order to form a full and fleshed out argument. I think you don't need to necessarily prove that adults have a different kind of ADHD than children to say that adults and children could respond to the neurofeedback therapy differently (you could look at the different ways they think and other stuff like that) and I think that way you could find it easier to prove that ADHD is still relevant in adults. Also, if you talk more about the neurological way that neurofeedback works I think you could relate it to adults who exhibit symptoms of ADHD (even if it's hard to prove they HAVE ADHD instead of other mental illnesses) because then you could say, either way it helps with the higher brain waves/activity.
ReplyDeleteYou're doing great! I love your topic, it seems super cool! (Word Count: 163)
Sunskruthi, I think this seems good, but I have a few questions. First, you start the significance by talking about the prevalence in children, but then your question includes adults. How can you use the children stats for your significance if it ignores adults? Perhaps show how adults aren't configured into typically descriptions about ADHD, thus showing a problem?
ReplyDeleteAlso, I think the different subsections of your paper need to be logically tied together. I want to see more conversation in your literature review, not just independently proving claims and expecting us, the reader, to make the connections between them.